I am a novice blogger, so I hope you more experienced folks will have mercy on me. A word of introduction is perhaps called for. I am 53, a Presbyterian Church USA pastor in northwest IN, married with 10 children (3 home grown, 7 adopted, 2 with Down Syndrome, 2 with Fetal Alchohol Syndrome, 2 have passed away). My wife is an attorney and we have been married for 26 years.
Now, about the blog's title. It comes from a book by theologian Paul Tillich entitled, oddly enough, On the boundary. You will see as this blog continues that about the only thing that Tillich and I agree on is the fact that there is a divine being and the name Jesus keeps coming up in this connection. Oh yes, and the fact that, as Christians, if we are true to our faith, we can never feel completely at home in any human ideology. The book has chapters like "Between theology and sociology", "Between Lutheranism and Socialism", "Between Religion and Culture". The point Tillich makes is that, while he identifies with some aspects of all of these he cannot totally identify himself with any of them.
As to the specifics we disagree, but the basic premise is sound. Years before Brian McLaren and his pile of mush A generous orthodoxy, I would jokingly introduce myself as a Calvinist evangelical charismatic pacifist pro-life post-trib amillenialist Christian. All of those descriptions are true to a fair extent, but I find if I am with people who identify themsleves primarily by one of them (except simply Christian) I start feeling uncomfortable. It seems that, especially with the hot button ones like pacifist and pro-life, that people who claim those titles tend to become lap-dogs of the political party or ideology that fits their issue into their platform. When I see that there is a statement on some issue of the day from the Southern Baptists or my own PCUSA, I just have to look up the position of the Republican or Democratic party, respectively, and I already know what they are going to say.
Jesus said to Pilate, "My kingdom is not of this world. If My kngdom were of this world, then My servants would be fighting so that I would not be handed over to the Jews, but as it is, My kingdom is not of this realm." (John 19:36) Jesus did not mean that His kingdom had nothing to do with life on earth but that the values, the very nature of His kingdom is totally different from the way our world works. Our sinful nature has the way of this world as our default setting when it comes to thinking and decision making, so as followers of Jesus Christ we have to be on the lookout for this tendency in our life. We have to be willing not to fit in completely anywhere. That doesn't mean we go out of our way to be contrary as some do. It doesn't mean we pride ourselves on who doesn't like us. It does mean that, with the help of the Holy Spirit, we become aware when we become too comfortable, too complacent, when we fit too easily into any human category.
Now, about the blog's title. It comes from a book by theologian Paul Tillich entitled, oddly enough, On the boundary. You will see as this blog continues that about the only thing that Tillich and I agree on is the fact that there is a divine being and the name Jesus keeps coming up in this connection. Oh yes, and the fact that, as Christians, if we are true to our faith, we can never feel completely at home in any human ideology. The book has chapters like "Between theology and sociology", "Between Lutheranism and Socialism", "Between Religion and Culture". The point Tillich makes is that, while he identifies with some aspects of all of these he cannot totally identify himself with any of them.
As to the specifics we disagree, but the basic premise is sound. Years before Brian McLaren and his pile of mush A generous orthodoxy, I would jokingly introduce myself as a Calvinist evangelical charismatic pacifist pro-life post-trib amillenialist Christian. All of those descriptions are true to a fair extent, but I find if I am with people who identify themsleves primarily by one of them (except simply Christian) I start feeling uncomfortable. It seems that, especially with the hot button ones like pacifist and pro-life, that people who claim those titles tend to become lap-dogs of the political party or ideology that fits their issue into their platform. When I see that there is a statement on some issue of the day from the Southern Baptists or my own PCUSA, I just have to look up the position of the Republican or Democratic party, respectively, and I already know what they are going to say.
Jesus said to Pilate, "My kingdom is not of this world. If My kngdom were of this world, then My servants would be fighting so that I would not be handed over to the Jews, but as it is, My kingdom is not of this realm." (John 19:36) Jesus did not mean that His kingdom had nothing to do with life on earth but that the values, the very nature of His kingdom is totally different from the way our world works. Our sinful nature has the way of this world as our default setting when it comes to thinking and decision making, so as followers of Jesus Christ we have to be on the lookout for this tendency in our life. We have to be willing not to fit in completely anywhere. That doesn't mean we go out of our way to be contrary as some do. It doesn't mean we pride ourselves on who doesn't like us. It does mean that, with the help of the Holy Spirit, we become aware when we become too comfortable, too complacent, when we fit too easily into any human category.
3 Comments:
Welcome to the world of blogging, Papa C. I hope you have a fun experience. Try to ignore the jerks who will stop by to insult you and then log off and run to the safety of playing video games in their mother's basements, even though they're 45 years old. Oh, and they never graduated high school.
;)
Your post brings to mind Kierkegaard's ideas on faith and doubt (or perhaps it's just cause I'm reading one of his books and have him on the brain at the moment). I think he was the one who talked about how doubt is necessary to have faith because if we don't doubt something (God's existence) then we are sure of its existence and therefore have no faith (i.e. if I have a pencil in my hand I can't have faith that it is there). I think that with ideaologies like Calvinism or Catholicism or what have you if we don't question them or doubt their validity we fall into presumption and abandon hope and faith. We rest on the assurance of things seen rather than hope in the the assurance of things unseen and ultimately worship a god made to fit the way we think.
It also reminds me of a joke :)
Two rabbis are sitting in the park discussing the Torah. They begin to argue over a particular matter and can't seem to find a resolution. "You are horribly mistaken," one of them says.
"No you are the one who is mistaken," says the other.
Just then God opens the heavens and looks down on the two men. "What are you argueing about?" He asks.
They explain the disagreement and God says, "I'm sorry Rabbi Reisberg, but Rabbi Coen is correct."
Rabbi Reisberg considers what has thinks to himself for a moment, looks at God and the other rabbi, and says, "Alright, that makes it two to one."
I just found your blog through Presbyterian Bloggers. Welcome! I enjoyed reading your posts.
Post a Comment
<< Home